West Wing Continuity Guide
----
Episodes|Characters|Merchandise|Queries|FAQ|Info|Links|New
path: Home / Australia * The Australian Press on Individual Episodes

These Were Collected by L.M. & Organized by Natalie G.

REVIEW FOR "ISAAC & ISHMAEL"
  Date: 16th October, 2001
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: A Contemplative Time For The West Wing Gang Egos Set Aside As Real-life Events Hit Home
  Author: Robin Oliver
Nine, 10.30pm:
"Just as I am contemplating buying a new car, it is disappointing to discover that none of the new models is fitted with panic overdrive, the mode in which the world now appears to require us to drive headlong. Which rather troubles me, for while motoring along on Sunday listening to the prattles of a behavioural pundit on Malcolm T. Elliot's otherwise rather cheerful radio chatter on 2UE (supermarket shopping bags and a multitude of listeners called Jan; now those are important matters) he had me believe that in times of war commonsense is abandoned and a sombre mood descends upon one and all".

Maybe, though maybe not, for I can remember that during the war, even as bombs could be heard falling on the approaches to London, cinemas would stop the flick and a Wurlitzer player would rise from the depths. ``Let's show Jerry we can make more noise than he can,'' he would suggest. Everybody would cheer mightily and sing along to the words of popular songs projected on the screen, each chased by a bouncing dot to show where we had got to. From this distance, it is hard for us to fathom the mood of New Yorkers, so suddenly assaulted, and interesting that such comic luminaries as Bill Cosby and Jerry Seinfeld recently staged a benefit concert to show everybody that it was still OK to laugh. Which brings us to The West Wing, which last week in the US opened its new season after a week's delay, following considerable soul searching. Nine won't be showing the new series with President Bartlett's tricky re-election campaign until the new season starts in February but, having drawn a swag of appreciative viewers to this entertaining series, is wisely reacting by showing a special episode Isaac and Ishmael written and produced within three weeks of events of September 11. In a special and very American set of introductions by the cast it is Brad Whitford, who plays White House deputy chief of staff Josh Lyman, who says: ``Don't panic, we're in show business and next week we'll get back to tending our egos in short order. But tonight we are offering a play. We suggest you don't spend a lot of time trying to fathom where this series comes in the timeline of the series. It doesn't, it is a storytelling aberration.'' Lyman is in the middle of giving a welcoming lecture to some high school students when he is interrupted by a ``crash'' White House terminology for an external crisis. What he does is offer a rationale of Islamic principles and beliefs dating back to medieval times. It is all rather pat, but behind an only moderately intriguing scenario of a newly suspect member of the White House staff, those who enjoy the flamboyance of The West Wing will gain some pleasure here. Particularly as Josh manages to thoroughly fertilise his ego in a speedily written episode that admittedly could have done with some tweaking, but offers itself as an encouraging example of American television running on the best of intentions. I enjoyed it, but I'm a fan, and for a while, as did those old-fashioned cinema organists, it offers an acceptable escape hatch from the universal din going on everywhere else. Hot Bubblegum

  Date: 16th October, 2001
  Publication: The West Australian
  Headline: Lame duck West Wing.
  Author: Mark Naglazas.
THE great strength of The West Wing throughout its first two seasons has been its balanced, liberal-humanist response to even the most incendiary and divisive of situations.

Martin Sheen's President Josiah Bartlet may be a Democrat and his staff solidly on the left but all opinions are given a voice and, with brilliant creator-writer Aaron Sorkin providing the words, a most articulate voice at that. This mainly bipartisan approach is one of the reasons for the show's popularity and why millions of Americans tuned into The West Wing's special episode made in response to the events of September 11 (Nine, 10.30pm). They were looking for sanity and meaning in a world seemingly gone mad. Unfortunately, this balanced, non-inflammatory approach to the terrorist attacks makes it a stillborn drama - preachy, self-important and pulling its punches so often that it's hardly surprising the episode has, ironically, angered both left and right in the US. The clumsy dramatic device of having the staff address a group of visiting high school students trapped inside The White House during a security lapse can be forgiven because this one-off episode, called Isaac and Ishmael, was made in record time after the atrocities. However, in having the students ask a series of questions - "What's the deal with everybody trying to kill you?" one youngster asks Josh Lyman - Sorkin reduces what may have been a powerful debate about the roots of terrorism, the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, America's role in the Middle-East and so forth into a social studies class for stragglers. Sure, many of these issues are covered and there is even a little sparring between Josh and the others staffers. But Sorkin is so anxious not to offend, obvious points are not made, such as the billions of dollars Washington poured into supporting the mujahedin during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan then abandoning them once the Russians were defeated. Even more annoying is that many of the assertions, such as the claim by Rob Lowe's Sam Seaborn that terrorism has never worked, are allowed to pass unchallenged, something that would never happen in a regular season episode of The West Wing. Anyone with even the most rudimentary grasp of history would know that terrorism has been incredibly effective in achieving political ends, most notably in the foundation of Israel. Unfortunately, in attempting to salve America's wounds The West Wing has fatally compromised itself as drama. The result is a lame duck show at a time when we desperately need a little moral and intellectual leadership from our most valued artists.

  Date: 15th October, 2001
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: TV Previews
  Author: Robin Oliver
The West Wing Nine, 10.30pm
A mend-your-ways message recently went out from our place to a friend who had not seen The West Wing. His only chance for a while, we told him, was the final episode of the season, which concluded with President Bartlet, dripping wet for various silly reasons, determinedly stuffing his hands in his trouser pockets as he prepared to address a press conference on whether he was intending to seek re-election for a second term. This agreeable President, beautifully played by Martin Sheen, suffers from multiple sclerosis, something we knew, but his senior aides had only just learned. The press conference was intended to overcome the fact that he had lied to the nation by concealing his condition. A questioner had been set up to give Bartlet an easy ride, but the President was too crafty for that. He looked at the man, turned away and fielded the tougher question. To stand or not? That is when he shoved his hands in his pockets and the series went for the big fade. It wasn't an outstanding episode cliffhangers seldom have been seen since somebody shot J.R. and in our disappointment we wondered what our friend could have possibly made of it. So far, we haven't heard a peep. Now we are rescued, for here comes a West Wing special dropped in to replace the intended start of the new US season two weeks ago and yes, it lets slip that Bartlet is no quitter but it is interesting because it demonstrates the enormous sensitivity American networks are displaying in the wake of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. The episode is a stand-alone, divorced from the ongoing story, but it is no makeweight. It was written and produced within 2 1/2 weeks of September 11, and opens with members of the cast coming on separately to explain the show's enormous dilemma. Rather happily it is Josh Lyman (Bradley Whitford) who eventually cracks the ice by promising that the following week (last Wednesday in the US, in fact) his White House colleagues would be back stroking their egos. We won't see them doing that here until next season. Here for now is Isaac and Ishmael, a pertinent story about terrorism in the world today, but not about the World Trade Centre. It is screening as it was shown in the US, relief fund appeals and all. The program shows its haste. I'd mark it down as a noble effort, but no more than that in the longer run.

  Date: 11th October, 2001
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: West Wing's Sorkin Takes A Chance On America's Horror
  Author: Debi Enker
  Episode: "Isaac & Ishmael"
A TORRENT of criticism flooded over The West Wing following the US screening of this special stand-alone episode on October 3. Although it attracted the highest audience ever for the series, 25.2 million viewers (it averages around 18 million), various American critics blasted the show for being pompous, sanctimonious, self-important, narcissistic and even icky. The show's creator-writer, Aaron Sorkin, was accused of ``monumental hubris''. The more generous members of the press allowed that the episode, Isaac and Ishmael, highlighted the best and worst of the series: its literate dialogue, filled with biblical, historical and political allusions, and its penchant for preaching.

In Australia, Channel Nine took one look at the episode that it had originally scheduled for the special time of 8.30pm and pushed it back to the regular 10.30pm slot: this was not, Nine decided, the episode destined to lure a broader audience to the political drama. Conceived, written and produced in the two weeks following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, this episode was hastily scheduled by NBC to replace the third season opener. Sorkin and his team clearly judged that a drama set at the White House couldn't blithely proceed as if nothing had happened and made the risky decision to try something even as the dust from the World Trade Centre was settling. The one-off episode doesn't fit into the series' regular time frame: it doesn't take up where we left off, with President Jed Bartlet (Martin Sheen) wrestling with the decision about whether to seek a second term. And it doesn't mention the September 11 attacks. Instead, it takes a more oblique approach, sealing its presidential staffers into the building's canteen with a group of high-school students who are stuck there during a security lockdown. Then it attempts to grapple with some of the questions arising from a situation of threat. Sorkin creates a context in which inquiries can be made and responses offered. The students face the alternately abrasive and vulnerable deputy chief of staff, Josh Lyman (Bradley Whitford), and his assistant, Donna Moss (Janel Moloney), with initially tentative queries: Why is everybody trying to kill us? Do you get scared coming to work in the White House? Where do terrorists come from? Over the hour, Josh's and Donna's colleagues drift in, searching for apples and peanut butter, and offer their opinions: C.J. (Allison Janney) supports the CIA; Toby (Richard Schiff) likens the Taliban to the Nazis; Sam (Rob Lowe) asserts - somewhat unconvincingly - that terrorism is ineffective; Charlie (Dule Hill) ponders the similarities between urban gangs and terrorist groups. Sorkin presents this range of views without breaking character: Nobody says anything that seems incongruous, given what we already know of them. The sub-story, involving Leo McGarry (John Spencer) and the interrogation of an Arab-American employee, pushes the chief of staff into tough and topical territory. The episode looks as if it was put together quickly - Sorkin must've been writing even faster than his usual warp-speed - and it does have its moments of flag-waving and bursts of patriotic cheering about the value of a pluralistic society. At times, it resembles a classroom. But it is also an extremely gutsy attempt to produce something thoughtful and meaningful. At a point when the US was convulsed by grief, anger and confusion, Sorkin took a risk in trying to produce a drama that spoke to its times. As Lowe says during the introduction, ``We wanted to stop for a moment and do something different.'' This is, Whitford explains, ``a play ... a storytelling aberration, if you'll allow''. It is also a commendable effort by one of TV's most gifted writers. Sorkin and the West Wing team took a chance. Given limited time, a fever-pitch of emotions and a swirl of uncertainty, what they have come up with is admirable. It is also able to go a lot further than some US journalists are now allowed to go in print when Josh, considering those with grievances against the US, says that ``it's probably a good idea to acknowledge that they do have legitimate complaints''. That alone is worth applauding, especially when it comes from mainstream network television, a branch of the medium not generally renowned for its risk-taking.

REVIEW FOR "MANCHESTER I"
  Date: 5th February, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: A Hyperactive White House
  Author: Michael Shmith
"THE trouble with The West Wing (Nine, 10.30pm) is that nobody remains still for more than half a second - and that's usually too long. They're all so busy. This is Machiavelli on the move, Caesar on the slide: furniture is for ducking past, not sitting on; even Air Force One, which figures in the first of this two-parter, seems lumbering compared to its hyperactive occupants. This is, I guess, what the White House really is. After all, the legion of advisers to this superior soap (lightly sprinkled with attar of roses, the Presidential crest stamped on the obverse) includes Dee Dee Myers and Marlin Fitzwater - and they were fast movers in their days."

The big question in tonight's episode concerns President Bartlet and his recently revealed multiple sclerosis. The question of will he or won't he seek re-election is not as important as the real concern: What will he say when he reconfirms his intentions? (Another question crossed my mind: does this President eat pretzels?) To assist him are many speechwriters who are not very good at putting words together. If they'd been at Gettysburg, the battle could never have started. Especially C.J. Cregg, the sensitively abrupt media spokespanjandrum who makes a huge error in response to an aggressive question concerning the President's abilities to properly judge a prospective invasion of Haiti: ``I think the President's relieved to concentrate on something that matters,'' says C.J., producing one of West Wing's rare moments of complete stillness and silence. Add to this, the First Lady's continuing problem with the bottle and whether or not the First Man is paying her enough attention. Then there's someone called Bruno, employed to get the President re-elected, who is just plain nasty to everyone in sight. He's going to be trouble, Bruno. Perhaps the First Lady will knock him out with an empty fifth Jack Daniels and save the rest of the cast the trouble.

REVIEW FOR "MANCHESTER II"
  Date: 11th February, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: TV Previews
  Author: Stuart O'Connor
The West Wing Nine, 10.30pm
Of course, we all knew he would decide to run for a second term. Was it ever in doubt? There was absolutely no surprise last week when President Jed Bartlet (Martin Sheen) stood there in front of the press and, when asked, replied with a confident: ``Yep and I'm gonna win.'' This week it's time to get down to the serious business of planning just how to make sure that Bartlet does, indeed, win the next election. To that end, campaign strategist Bruno Gianelli (Ron Silver) is brought in to help, which leads to clashes between his staff and the President's. First Lady Abby (Stockard Channing) is still fuming that she was not consulted in her husband's decision to run for a second term. Some of the staff are still angry they weren't told sooner about the President's MS. C.J. (Allison Janney) is worried the press might think the Bartlets' marriage is in trouble. And to top it all off, there's still the situation in Haiti to deal with. All in all, just an average day at the White House as this excellent series continues to shine like a beacon in the dreary fog that is commercial television.

REVIEW FOR "WAYS & MEANS"
  Date: 14th February, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: TV HIGHLIGHTS
  Author: Annmaree Bellman
The West Wing TUESDAY, CHANNEL NINE, 10.30PM
When we first encountered the Bartlett administration, it was a healthy beast, fighting the good fight in a world of political expediency. Now, as Josh beseechingly tells an opponent, it is bleeding. The White House is weak and the jackals are circling, led by a crusading special prosecutor investigating President Bartlett's failure to disclose his illness. Subpoenas are being issued, Donna is losing her wits among the document boxes, the re-election campaign heavies are increasingly alienating our heroes. It's complex political manoeuvring at its best as CJ injects herself back into the game with a daring battle plan and the boys handle a congressional assault on an estate tax bill and dwindling campaign support. Outside the corridors of power, a bushfire is raging in Yellowstone National Park. The governor of Wyoming is demanding that it be put out, but Bartlett is supporting the environmental call to let it burn for the good of the wilderness. The episode's complex wheeling and dealing make the few quiet presidential moments centring on the continued impact of Mrs Landingham's death all the more poignant. And if you want romance on Valentine's Day? Tame Republican Ainsley sets up a blind date for the harassed, unlucky in love Donna.

REVIEWS FOR "ON THE DAY BEFORE"
  Date: 2nd March, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: COUCH LIFE
  Author: Jonathan Green
Sometimes it is indeed the elegantly minimal that is the most effective, and much as The West Wing (Nine, Tuesday) draws its charm from a robustly paced combination of disparate elements - this is after all the drama in which one tracking shot can encompass as many as six distinct plot strands - there are times when the construction can seem a trifle forced. At moments in Tuesday's episode, subplots raised their heads to sniff the air like curious, unwanted voles in otherwise picture-perfect turf. The effect was not to lend pace and tension, but to distract, which was a pity, because the central thrust of the drama just now is superb, with the Bartlet administration hunkering down under the scrutiny of a subpoena-happy special prosecutor. The tension on Tuesday as the House met in an extraordinary session that narrowly failed to overturn a presidential veto was convincingly electric. It has to be said - albeit by someone who has the luxury of watching the program in advance on preview tape - that the scheduling of The West Wing, last week's new starter Six Feet Under and, presumably, the Sopranos when it returns to Nine in June, is an insult both to quality drama and its audience. The problem is, of course, that each of these programs has its purchase price, and it's simply too high a fee to be paid by the ABC, a network where, one assumes, the 300,000 people happy to watch the dramatised innards of American politics each week would be welcomed to the schedule at something closer to prime time.

  Date: 26th February, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: Keep One Hand On The Remote, Lest You Get Stuck And Suffer A Fate Worse Than Death
  Author: Doug Anderson
The West Wing 10.30pm, 9:
A State Department dinner approaches and President Bartlett boldly dares to veto the ``death tax'' bill. Will this have an effect on ratings? Can his staff deal with the repercussions of this politically risky initiative?

REVIEW FOR "WAR CRIMES"
  Date: 5th March, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: Igneous Eruptions. Ignominious Seductions. If Only They Could Get Together In A Puff Of Smoke
  Author: Doug Anderson
The West Wing 10.30pm, 9:
There's been a spontaneous and rather abrupt sermon from an armed individual at the United Baptist church in Texas. Daryl Bechtelle, seeking to give his estranged wife a second navel, has opened up on her with his trusty .38. Another parishioner whips out his Glock revolver and returns fire ... another member of the congregation is fatally wounded. President Bartlett, knowing the passion for pistols that surges through the heart of Texas, invites his somewhat reluctant VP, John Hoynes, to tool down to Dubbya territory to address an anti-gun rally.

  Date: 5th March, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: Sharp Dialogue And Serious Wit
  Author: Raymond Gill
Many of us have been patiently waiting for the best small-screen writer in America to re-find his edge after the schmaltz-fest induced by September 11. Any aficionado of The West Wing (Channel Nine, 10.30pm) knows that the combined brilliance of Leo, Toby, Donna, CJ and Josh is enough - but only just enough -to defeat the mawkishness of Martin Sheen's homily-addicted, Bible-literate President Bartlet, a man who can't ask for the butter to be passed without turning the request into a historically accurate anecdote about the importance of butter being passed fairly and decently and with due regard to the democratic traditions of butter-passing. In the wake of global terror, Aaron Sorkin's president has become even more insufferably erudite and ethical, leaving us all with a hearty appetite for a buxom intern or two. At last, Sorkin gets back to doing what he does best: demonstrating how the big issues get camouflaged, compromised and eventually clarified by the small, through the vehicle of razor-sharp dialogue and serious wit.

In the course of one drizzly Sunday morning, Donna's spontaneous mistake leaves the West Wing vulnerable, proposed war-crimes legislation shines a light on Leo's past and, now that Timothy Busfield has gone, there's a new gonzo journalist in the press corps to flirt with CJ. There's also some light fluff for Sam concerning the worth of the penny. This minor story line is perfectly pitched for the talents of Rob Lowe. The highlight of the episode is a brilliantly scripted tete-a-tete about gun control between the shiny president and his snarky and little-seen vice-president, in which their profound distaste for each other must play second fiddle to their symbiotic grasp on power. Excitingly, this is also the episode where Toby stuffs up, when his casual in-house remark that if the president wins office again it will be ``by riding the coat-tails of the vice-president'' reaches the press. Toby being Toby, the hand-wringing Jewish mama of the West Wing, he manages to turn this into an opportunity to gather every junior staffer in the canteen and blitz them with a guilt-fest climaxing in the confession that even though one of them had shafted him, ``he would do anything for them''. Anything, that is, except deny himself a chance for a long, worthy speech that eats up plenty of screen time.

REVIEW FOR "GONE QUIET"
  Date: 12th March, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: Oh Dear, Propaganda From The Axis Of Evil - But It's Nothing The West Wing Can't Handle
  Author: Doug Anderson
The West Wing 10.30pm, 9:
President Bartlett faces another ticklish situation when an American submarine, possibly en route to the Museum of Arrogance in Tehran, disappears off the coast of North Korea. The axis of evil? The Bermuda Triangle? Or some other geometric zone of death? Two options emerge. One is to mount a secret rescue operation in hostile waters and the second is to send a crate of Jack Daniels industrial-grade Benedictine to Kim Jong II with a polite note asking for assistance.

  Date: 12th March, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: Oval Office Never Pear-shaped
  Author: Raymond Gill
Last week the stakes were raised as Donna lied, Toby leaked, and Leo was lured into a 180 degrees over a war crime bill, but tonight it's back to West Wing Lite. Creator Aaron Sorkin likes to keep us on our toes - none of this continued-next-week stuff. Instead, he mixes it up, shuffling story lines, harking back to ancient WW history and so reminding us that in the world's most powerful oval-shaped office there are a zillion crises and intrigues at play simultaneously.

As the camera whooshes through these corridors of power, there's always a sense that if the lens turns right you'll bump into a Situation Room cliffhanger, turn left and you'll find the honest and earnest prez-assistant, Charlie, angsting over some minor protocol indiscretion. (Despite the speed of these tracking shots you need never fear the camera's going to front-end a gaggle of coffee-slurping extras - more thought appears to go into this bit-part choreography than goes into the entire writing, acting and direction of the Australian television industry.) Tonight's episode of The West Wing (Channel Nine, 10.30 pm) opens with CJ at her gawkily comic best, gyrating to the sounds of I'm too sexy. No, CJ hasn't found love because no one who works at the White House seems to have a private life (the closest we come is Donna and Josh's Tracy/Hepburn-ish flirtation). Instead, CJ gets off on the inane response a rival presidential hopeful has given to the question ``Why do you want to be president?'' But CJ, realising her own president doesn't have a pat answer to The Big Question, sees her and Josh plunge into a maelstrom of semantics as they try and come up with one: ``Something about health, blah, blah, something about the Internet, blah, blah ...'' Toby, too, gets to have his comic moment, deadpan of course, as he argues for the retention of $105 million in funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. As a prim Republican lobbyist lists the taxpayer-funded wacko artists whose work includes smearing their body in chocolate while reciting the script from The Godfather backwards, Toby fights back with noble words about the worth of the arts. So noble they could come from the mouth of President Bartlet. But Bartlet tonight is in a lighter mood. Even the possibility of losing a sub in North Korean waters doesn't take the spring out of his step as he allows jokes about his height and his fondness for Latin phrases to reflect well on him. The only sign of gathering storm clouds are the First Lady's murky involvement in keeping mum about the First Hubby's MS. It's all very Hillary, all very Whitewater.

REVIEWS FOR "THE INDIANS IN THE LOBBY"
  Date: 19th March, 2002
  Publication: The West Australian
  Headline: Back off Mr Bartlet.
  Author: Mark Naglazas
"MUCH as I love Martin Sheen in his guise as President Josiah Bartlet in The West Wing (Nine, 10.30pm), his blustering has the tendency to blow everyone else off the screen".

Sheen is a small man in a tall cast, headed by Allison Janney's towering press secretary CJ Cregg. However, when the veteran actor and real-life political activist starts bellowing about democracy or the constitution or, as in tonight's Thanksgiving episode, the best way to cook a turkey, all his aides can do is hang on for dear life. Sheen's rise to power on The West Wing is ironic because his character was conceived by series creator Aaron Sorkin as a much more shadowy figure. The emphasis was on the hard-working men and women who got him elected and make sure the wheels of government are well oiled. However, Bartlet proved to be such a popular character - perhaps because he possesses all the qualities that Americans yearn for in a president but rarely get - that Sheen became The West Wing's focus. Homer Simpson did much the same thing, elbowing aside his son Bart and "Doh!" replacing "Don't have a cow, man" as the show's catch cry. This is a shame, because Bartlet striding through a celebrated drama like a colossus shifts things away from the power-broking - the fascinating, spirit-sapping struggle to get things done in the face of so many competing interest groups - toward the agony and ecstasy of being the president of the world's remaining superpower. A good example of this tendency of Bartlet to overwhelm The West Wing is in a sub-plot in tonight's episode. The president discovers that Bruno Gianelli, his equally blustery re-election campaign adviser (the marvellous Ron Silver), is planning to make political mileage out of the first family's holiday plans. Bartlet shouts his objection, Gianelli barks his reply and the matter is solved within moments. Sure, the sparks flying is great fun and it's a hoot to have the silver-tongued Silver cut the president off at the knees, but I'd much rather watch Josh agonise over where the family and CJ sweat about how to make the announcement. In other words, this is a rare instance when I'd prefer the president to be a little more hands-off. Let him go play golf or fool around with the interns while his staff gets on with the job of running a great television show.

  Date: 19th March, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: One Chief, Not Enough Indians
  Author: Michael Shmith
It's Thanksgiving eve on The West Wing (10.30pm, Nine) and President Bartlet is talking turkey. Well, how to stuff one. Now one can see President Pretzel, eyes narrowed, discussin' the fahner porns of Texan Shorthorns while tryin' not to choke, but when a fictitious world leader begins to do it on prime-time TV, it's time to be worried - especially when he gets on the phone to a culinary hotline, gives a false name and address (surely a constitutional misdemeanour?), all to find out if the stuffing should be cooked before it's stuffed or if it's OK to stuff first and cook later. Which would have them scratching the mortarboards at Harvard political studies. Meanwhile, the redoubtable CJ is dealing with two Indians in the lobby. ``There are two Indians in the lobby,'' she says to a colleague. "One of them wants to become a rabbi?'' he replies. Just like that.

That Two Indians in the Lobby also happens to be the title of this episode also gives you the ominous thought, early on, that they're not going to go away; otherwise, the episode would have been called How to Stuff a Turkey Cold, or perhaps Mon petit fromage, as the President addresses the First Lady. One's not sure if this term of endearment is just that, or a secret ingredient in the stuffing. The two Indians in the lobby are in the lobby because the lobby is the lobby and not therefore in private, which makes it easier for them to lobby from the lobby instead of CJ's office, which is nowhere near the lobby since CJ appears short of breath when she reaches it. I think the Indians are there to Make a Point, which involves clearing some long-blocked legislation. Just like trying to find a plumber at Thanksgiving to clear some long-blocked toilet (or maybe the President's overstuffed turkey), CJ can't achieve the impossible. So the Indians - one short woman; one tall man -stay put.

  Date: 18th March, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: TV Previews
  Author: Matt Buchanan
The West Wing Nine, 10.30pm
This is a cracking episode not least for the problems caused by President Jed boring everyone into the Potomac with his two specialist subjects: how to cook a gourmet Thanksgiving turkey and the life and times of Bess Truman. After all, how do you tell the President he is being as dull as a small brown bag? Consider CJ's approach, who, after zoning in and out listening to his ruminations, gives up and says: ``I can hang in there with the best of them, Sir, but somewhere in the discussion of anise and coriander and the other 15 spices you like to use to baste a turkey, I just lost consciousness.'' Snappy, brave, but not that smart as Bartlet immediately answers: ``You know that line you're not suppose to cross with the President?'' ``I'm coming up on it?'' ``No, no. Look behind you.''

REVIEW FOR "THE WOMEN OF QUMAR"
  Date: 26th March, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: When Mad Cows And Prostitutes Come Together, Fishing For Smart Drama Is A Worthy Exercise
  Author: Doug Anderson
The West Wing 10.30pm, 9:
A women's lobby group is anxious to discuss with President Bartlet the wording of a treaty with the Qumari Government regarding the Administration's stance on prostitution. These cogitations open the way for a sub-textural discourse on foreign policy as an instrument of prostitution and pimping on the macro-economic level. It's all about screwing people for money in the long run. Elsewhere, CJ is arguing the toss with West Wing staffers over the wisdom of ventilating reports of a possible outbreak of mad cow disease. Tony Blah should be able to help there by offering the worst possible scenario as implemented by his Government. As ever, the program exposes how matters might proceed if the level of debate in the actual Administration was as open and as provocative as it is here and if the tenth-rate bozo steering the nation at present had the mental acuity of the fictional president. US foreign policy more resembles a concoction by the writers of the vicious cartoon The Itchy and Scratchy Show than the work of the people who create this eminently watchable series.

REVIEWS FOR "100,000 AIRPLANES"
  Date: 14th April, 2002
  Publication: Sun Herald
  Headline: CRITIC'S CHOICE
  Author: Brian Courtis
TUESDAY **** The West Wing: 100,000 Airplanes, Channel 9, 10.30pm
Another rich episode in which Aaron Sorkin revels in delivering ways to get his president out of trouble. Bartlet (Martin Sheen), forced to accept a congressional censure, needs something for his State of the Union address to boost his approval rating. A gathering of oncologists dining with the First Lady inspires him. "We're 10 years, $25 billion and a good-luck charm away from curing cancer," one says. An exhausted Bartlet offers this to his less enthusiastic staffers. "If we can land a man on the moon, why can't we cure cancer?" The rest of the show, of course, is spent explaining why that might not be a good idea.

  Date: 16th April, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: Thanks To Science, Building A Human Is Easy Enough. But Class Doesn't Come Quite So Easily
  Author: Doug Anderson
The West Wing 10.30pm, 9:
It's almost as big as the Oscars or the Superbowl ... the night Bartlet fronts the nation to deliver his State of the Union address. How will he fare with the spectre of a congressional censure looming over him? Would he play the presidential veto on stem cell legislation as another, slightly less fictional, incumbent of the Oval Office has signalled? Elsewhere in the corridors of power, a magazine hack, once engaged to Sam, stalks him in quest of an exclusive.

  Date: 11th April, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: TELEVISION HIGHLIGHTS
  Author: Jim Schembri
The West Wing, TUESDAY, CHANNEL NINE, 10.30PM
For all the fast talking and people running from one White House office to another to word up some colleague about a troubling poll result or a crisis in some distant country (the ambassador of which once went to bed with one of the President's staff) that convinces us we are watching a high quality, realistic drama about modern politics, The West Wing is, at heart, a fantasy. Ask any right-thinking person who their ideal president would be and it won't be Washington or Lincoln or Jefferson or Kennedy, it'd be Martin Sheen. As the harried President Bartlet, Sheen is an amalgam of all the good points of America's better presidents. Even when things are bad, he's good. Beset by crises, riddled with personal doubts, professional setbacks and the odd medical problem, he nonetheless embodies a warm, comforting ideal around which the rest of the scurrying cast revolve. He has humour, wit, is usually level headed, self-deprecating and has grace under pressure. Better yet, when he is not graceful he becomes something we love even more: human. So when he appears to want to divert attention from a congressional censure by announcing that he wants to cure cancer within 10 years, we don't think he's ordered one too many lithium capsules from the presidential pharmacy. We think: ``You know, a decent guy would actually do that - and for the right reasons.'' Whatever maelstrom of deviousness may swirl around him, we can always think the best of him. Bartlet is the closest thing the US has had to a real people's president since Franklin D. Roosevelt. Being fictitious makes him all the easier to believe in.

REVIEW FOR "HARTSFIELD’S LANDING"
  Date: 7th May, 2002
  Publication: The West Australian
  Headline: TV BITES - TV REVIEWS.
  Author: SUE YEAP.
The West Wing, Nine/WIN, 10.30pm
IT IS only due to a lack of hours in the week and the late timeslot that I haven't become a regular viewer of The West Wing, surely one of TV's classiest dramas. The West Wing has the visual quality of the big screen and tackles worldly issues that make the family, crime and law themes covered in other dramas seem almost trivial. Bartlet returns from India bearing several antique chess sets as gifts for his surprised and wary staff. The juxtaposition of the president's simultaneous game playing with Toby and Sam and the military game playing occurring between the US, China and Taiwan is very clever. Big issues are handled in such a way that I often feel compelled to jump on CNN.com to see if such events are actually happening. And there's usually a balance between domestic and international issues. On the home front, Josh pushes Donna to see if she can sway voters so Bartlet doesn't lose the primary in Hartsfield's Landing, New Hampshire, population 42. Apparently these residents always provide an accurate barometer of how the rest of country will vote.

REVIEW FOR "DEAD IRISH WRITERS"
  Date: 13th May, 2002
  Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
  Headline: TV Previews
  Author: Jacquie Taffel
The West Wing Nine, 11pm
This week, on the soap opera for small `l' liberals, it's the First Lady's birthday and her husband has thrown a big bash. The party is racked with party politics and, as usual, White House staff rush around dealing with crises and developing various sub-plots. The difference is they're dressed to kill in their party gear: C.J. Cregg (Allison Janney) is particularly stunning and Sam Seaborn (Rob Lowe) knows he looks good in a suit. The rapid-fire dialogue provides some laugh-out-loud moments and there is the usual ``what the hell are they talking about'' viewer confusion, this time concerning a super collider. Fear not, all will be revealed (or at least enough to get a grip on the concept) by the end. Another well-written, well-acted piece of political fantasy that's highly addictive.

REVIEW FOR "STIRRED"
  Date: 28th May, 2002
  Publication: The Age
  Headline: Zeroing Out On Regal Niceness
  Author: Michael Shmith
They are zeroing out their technology challenge form, says a loquacious White House staffer in The West Wing (10.30pm, Channel 9), proving instant erudition and verbal bewilderment in the same sentence. The storyline of this episode, called ``Stirred'', comes from a former presidential press secretary, Dee Dee Myers, who certainly zeroed out of one lucrative job and into another. Stirred, since you ask, relates to mixing a dry martini by that method, which does not chip the ice: zeroing steady, you might say. Alcohol is a continuing worry to the West Wingers, who are trying to write off the Vice-President because he is a reforming alcoholic. Is there anyone who isn't? asks President Bartlet, who scribbles four words on a piece of paper he hands to the vodka-avoiding Veep. We are not privy to the phrase, though I guess it is safe to say it wasn't Candy's dandy; liquors quicker. All the real action in West Wing happens offstage, just like the wars in Handel's operas: saves chorus costs. Thus tonight's external catastrophe - truck carrying nuclear waste crashes into another vehicle in a mountain tunnel - is received with the same gravity and grace as the VP's drinking problem, someone else's worry about his taxation return, and the President's unexpected bout of niceness.

REVIEW FOR "THE BLACK VERA WANG"
  Date:: 7th July, 2002
  Publication: The Sunday Age
  Headline: Critics Choice
  Author: Ann Maree Bellman
Tuesday - The West Wing: The Black Vera Wang, Channel 9, 10.30pm
When "The West Wing" went missing in sports action for weeks there, it felt almost as though the real world had stopped. Who was running America, keeping tabs on those missile bases, organising Bartlet's fraught re-election campaign, protecting Claudia Jean from the cranks? It's something of a relief to see the White House back on track again, tackling the issue of terrorist threats in a spot-September 11 era and watching the awkward CJ cope with an attractive bodyguard. Some dirty campaigning going on, too. Now that's sport.

Previous SiteMap Next

Quotations & some other material copyrighted to John Wells Productions, et al.
Email westwing@bewarne.com to report mistakes, make comments, ask questions
(note: above email address doesn't reach anyone connected to the show itself).
     Amazon    MIS